George Lucas And Movies: No Future? Essay -- essays research papers f

George Lucas and Movies No time to come(a)?When looking into the future state see many different things. Whetherit be flying cars, buildings floating in the air, or people walking around inspace suits, ein truthone has their suffer idea. Most of the time when people lookinto the future they look faraway into it, not in the next several years. Thefuture is usually be as twenty or more years beyond the present. many an(prenominal)movies and stories written about the future world seem to nominate the customary themethat technology leave play a big component part in the development of the future. Thedevelopment of technology will strain to the advances that will take the worldinto the next century and beyond. George Lucas hire THX 1138 and RobertZemeckis Back to the Future are twain examples of movies that portray technologyand the advances of the future. THX 1138 and Back to the Future both portraytechnology as a danger to society that could at last lead to its downfall.G eorge Lucas made THX 1138 long before he became famous in his latermovies. He based the film on his movie that he used as his graduate project andthesis. It was his first attempt at directing and producing a Hollywood film.His goal was to create a film that would show the future state of the world ifit was to continue on its running of the search for perfection of everything. Heshows the future as a range that many people would probably not want to live orto be associated with.Lucas shows that everyone will be the akin. People will wear the sameclothes and have the same haircut. Names are no long-dated a part of society. Inthe movie each mortal is inclined a prefix of letters followed by a number. Theyare fundamentally drones who follow orders. Technology has advanced so far thatevery front or action of the soulfulness is monitored. Anytime that one of themdoes something wrong it immediately appears on the calculator screen as to whatthey are doing and what their number is. It is possible for the computer tomonitor all of their vital signs and mental activity. separately person is conservativelymonitored and watched. The people are told what to do and act based on how theywere trained. They guide in shifts of labor and are almost extensions of thecomputer that tells them what to do. There is no more guessing about disease orhow a person is feeling... ...This would mean that therewould be no set future for the world. Each person would try to change thefuture so that everything would benefit themselves. This would lead to theeventually destruction of society and maybe no future at all.George Lucas and Robert Zemeckis both portray the future in their films.The future however is very different between the two movies. In THX 1138everyone is controlled by the technology that has created computers that dopecontrol things. In Back to the Future each individual person has the option tocontrol the future of the world. both(prenominal) movies give too ove rmuch power to one thing.Either Technology or the individual have too much power to have society runsmoothly. Both of these things would most likely lead to the destruction ofsociety as it is. A point must be reached somewhere in the middle or there maynot even be a future for people to dream about.Works CitedBack to the Future. Dir. Robert Zemeckis. Perf. Michael J. Fox, ChristopherLloyd, Lea Thompson. 1985. Videocassette. Universal Pictures, 1986.THX 1138. Dir. George Lucas. Perf. Robert Duvall, Donald Pleasence. 1970.Videocassette. Warner Brothers, 1971